Grouped as we tasted them. Notes that ruby is aged in bottle and tawny aged in cask, except that cheap tawny will be a blend of ruby and white whereas cheap ruby will just be cheap.
Not very port-like and I wasn't very impressed, but Tony liked it. Aged in cask, dry and acidic, almost sour. It might grow on me, or Tony might get most of a bottle.
The first was sweet and smelly and bland, the second more complex and opaque and less sweet. For a cheap pleasant drink I'd go for the Monteira and I'm not sure that the Graham's was actually twice as good and therefore worth spending twice the money.
I liked both of these, and again the Monteiro was the simpler and sweeter taste. The Warre's was more complex, very blackcurranty, almost like Cassis but less sweet. I'd definitely buy the Warre's rather than the Graham's, I think it hit the value-for-money spot.
Not a vintage, but port from a single quinta, which I understood as farmholding. Very lovely and blackcurranty and dark and warming. This was my favourite and the one we walked away with (currently in the inherited decanter).
At this point we were getting onto the seriously long finishes, having to wait quite a while for the taste of one port to leave my mouth so I could taste the other. The Taylors was good tasty tawny port, a good standard. The Niepoort was heavier in smell and taste, and I think better, but I didn't think half-again as much better. If I were going to spend 30 pounds it wouldn't be on this, except as a present for someone who really liked it.
By now I was quite drunk, but the Quinta do Roriz was ok, fruity and flavoursome, but really needed more time. The manager said it needed another 10-15 years to be great. But already too expensive I think to buy now and wait that long. The Croft was just great and I hummed happily over it for some time. Rich smell and complex warmth say my notes, as well as a scrawled lovely.
Dry White, Churchill's £13
Not very port-like and I wasn't very impressed, but Tony liked it. Aged in cask, dry and acidic, almost sour. It might grow on me, or Tony might get most of a bottle.
Ruby, Monteiro £7
Crusted (bottled 1998), Graham's £15
Crusted (bottled 1998), Graham's £15
The first was sweet and smelly and bland, the second more complex and opaque and less sweet. For a cheap pleasant drink I'd go for the Monteira and I'm not sure that the Graham's was actually twice as good and therefore worth spending twice the money.
LBV 1999, Monteiro £9
LBV 1994, Warre's £14
LBV 1994, Warre's £14
I liked both of these, and again the Monteiro was the simpler and sweeter taste. The Warre's was more complex, very blackcurranty, almost like Cassis but less sweet. I'd definitely buy the Warre's rather than the Graham's, I think it hit the value-for-money spot.
Quinta do Bomfim 1996, Dow's £22.50
Not a vintage, but port from a single quinta, which I understood as farmholding. Very lovely and blackcurranty and dark and warming. This was my favourite and the one we walked away with (currently in the inherited decanter).
10yo Tawny, Taylors £20
Colheita 1994, Niepoort £29
Colheita 1994, Niepoort £29
At this point we were getting onto the seriously long finishes, having to wait quite a while for the taste of one port to leave my mouth so I could taste the other. The Taylors was good tasty tawny port, a good standard. The Niepoort was heavier in smell and taste, and I think better, but I didn't think half-again as much better. If I were going to spend 30 pounds it wouldn't be on this, except as a present for someone who really liked it.
Quinta do Roriz 1999 £35
Croft 1977 £52.50
Croft 1977 £52.50
By now I was quite drunk, but the Quinta do Roriz was ok, fruity and flavoursome, but really needed more time. The manager said it needed another 10-15 years to be great. But already too expensive I think to buy now and wait that long. The Croft was just great and I hummed happily over it for some time. Rich smell and complex warmth say my notes, as well as a scrawled lovely.
5 comments | Leave a comment