Why do none of the local parent+baby activities take place outside normal office hours? (With the sole exception of Saturdads.) Why are the vast majority of those activities actually mother+baby in practice?
Why are fathers-as-carers so little valued that there is felt to be a need for Saturdads?
How many fathers get quizzed as to how they will juggle their career and their family?
Why do we know no other families[1] where a father has taken a significant (if temporary) cut in working hours in order to share the childcare? I can't believe Tony is extreme among fathers in his love for Charles; I can't believe I am extreme among mothers in my love of my job. I suppose I can believe that the university is extreme in actually putting its money where its policies of work-life balance are.
[1] Ok, we sort-of know ONE local stay-at-home dad, in a very casual-acquaintance way.
There are biological limits on how long a mother can work into pregnancy, and how soon she can go back to work afterwards, no denying, but this is usually a matter of a few months, not years. Breastfeeding isn't a barrier to working, if the employer will allow pumping breaks (a matter of 20 minutes every few hours, and somewhere clean and private to do so).
Fundamentally, why is childcare seen as a "women's issue" rather than a "parent's issue"? I can't help feeling this is at the root of a lot of casual sexism. In an ideal world, fathers would be as likely as mothers to take reduced hours or time off for their children. (There may be a separate discussion as to just what concessions should be made to working parents versus working non-parents, but I think it is a disservice to both men and women to confuse "parents" with "mothers".)
Why are fathers-as-carers so little valued that there is felt to be a need for Saturdads?
How many fathers get quizzed as to how they will juggle their career and their family?
Why do we know no other families[1] where a father has taken a significant (if temporary) cut in working hours in order to share the childcare? I can't believe Tony is extreme among fathers in his love for Charles; I can't believe I am extreme among mothers in my love of my job. I suppose I can believe that the university is extreme in actually putting its money where its policies of work-life balance are.
[1] Ok, we sort-of know ONE local stay-at-home dad, in a very casual-acquaintance way.
There are biological limits on how long a mother can work into pregnancy, and how soon she can go back to work afterwards, no denying, but this is usually a matter of a few months, not years. Breastfeeding isn't a barrier to working, if the employer will allow pumping breaks (a matter of 20 minutes every few hours, and somewhere clean and private to do so).
Fundamentally, why is childcare seen as a "women's issue" rather than a "parent's issue"? I can't help feeling this is at the root of a lot of casual sexism. In an ideal world, fathers would be as likely as mothers to take reduced hours or time off for their children. (There may be a separate discussion as to just what concessions should be made to working parents versus working non-parents, but I think it is a disservice to both men and women to confuse "parents" with "mothers".)
46 comments | Leave a comment